Staffwiki:Building a new web

From Staffwiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Meetings)
m (Meetings)
Line 131: Line 131:
##to describe characteristics that appeal on the site
##to describe characteristics that appeal on the site
##state dislikes of any site or characteristic
##state dislikes of any site or characteristic
-
##Goal: Limit sites under consideration to 3 for the group after consideration. ''Bill: I do not want to limit tomorrow; more time to digest is needed and I will not want to continue until Gabrielle's choices have been posted.''
+
##Goal: Limit sites under consideration to 3 for the group after consideration. '''''From''''' ''Bill: I do not want to limit tomorrow; more time to digest is needed and I will not want to continue until Gabrielle's choices have been posted.''
##Action: Come prepared at next meeting with case for '''one''' model (WLG---It may be too soon to do this.  Will discuss. Choice of labels for parts of site will take 2-3 meetings, I imagine.)
##Action: Come prepared at next meeting with case for '''one''' model (WLG---It may be too soon to do this.  Will discuss. Choice of labels for parts of site will take 2-3 meetings, I imagine.)

Revision as of 22:56, 19 May 2009

Contents

Three Favorite Sites

Useful Links

CSU Library Page: http://library.csu.edu/

Library web servers: http://lists.webjunction.org/libweb/

Tips

Showing an internal page or two would help to evaluate the site.


Member's Favorites

Here is my list of three favorites -Beverly

  1. Site A http://beta.lib.umich.edu/browse/Education
     This seems very modern and up-to-date, especially in the browse section.  

Subsite: http://guides.lib.umich.edu/content.php?pid=24925

    The internal structure is mind-boggling.
   
  1. Site B http://www.vatican.va/phome_en.htm
    I understand this is one of the Dean's favorites--no boxy structure.

Subsite: http://asv.vatican.va/home_en.htm

    This is the "Secret Archives" subpage.  I like the cool center displays.
  1. Site C http://www.sxu.edu/Administrative/Library/
    This illustrates the "less is more" (ie, Google) approach:  only
    Highlights SEARCHING and ASKING; minimal other stuff.

Subsite: http://www.sxu.edu/Administrative/Library/

    A little boring next to the big guns at U of M, but probably more
    in our league of what we can do with only one web guy.  I like it
    that it follows the same page format as the home page.

Here is my list of three favorites -Bill

  1. Washington State University, Pullman
    1. http://www.wsulibs.wsu.edu/general/dept.htm
    2. http://www.wsulibs.wsu.edu/PSO/
  2. Ann Arbor District Library
    1. http://www.aadl.org/catalog
  3. Brigham Young University
    1. http://www.lib.byu.edu/
  • Pullman is an academic library with well-grouped labels in an attractive, clean design.
  • The Ann Arbor Public Library has a structure that will work in an academic library. It is 'blog based and highly interactive. Labels are well chosen, but still a little jargon laden.
  • BYU is a Luminis®-based site. CSU is getting Luminis, but the library server (in initial releases of Luminis) will be treated as a link, not an internal component of Luminis. This could change politically.
    1. If Luminis is mandated sitewide, the BYU site should be considered as a model.
    2. Tab based major divisions; good design, with clear labeling. Not cluttered with competing labels.

Here is my list of three favorites -Charlene

  1. Site A

Iowa Wesleyan College Mt. Pleasant IA http://chadwick.iwc.edu/ Clean, crisp, lots of white space, people using library; and choices are fairly clear on first page. Dialog boxes attached to content headings appears in one central location in a font that is easily readable. After first page content headings repeated in side bar. No mention of library administration.


  1. Site

BIUPUI Indianapolis IN http://www-lib.iupui.edu/ There are people with the potential to use the library and they are smiling. White space, content headings are clear and placed at the top of the page. Call out boxes similar to CSU’s. There is movement in the lower right hand area.


  1. Site C

Here is my list of three favorites -Fatemeh

  1. Site A http://www.wsulibs.wsu.edu/
  2. Site B http://library.lccs.edu/
  3. Site C http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/
  4. Site D http://www-lib.iupui.edu/
  5. Site E http://www.manchester.edu/oaa/Library/
  6. Site F http://www.cuyamaca.net/library/

I am sending 6 websites. Almost all my websites have the same style. Me favorite is IUPUI (Site D), I also like the peaceful color and simple arrangement of the others. See you on Wednesday and good luck (Fatemeh)


Here is my list of three favorites -Bob

Illinois State University http://www.library.ilstu.edu/#HomePage simple and clear

Syracuse University library http://library.syr.edu/ somewhat cluttered but parts are very good

Yale Univ. library Some good ideas here- looks sfxy http://databases.library.yale.edu:8331/V/BJB5XU9NB9GPQAE7TVHM9XNUK4M8H1GP6JVNYCAT4HUFULBXS5-38660?FUNC=FIND-DB-1&pds_handle=GUEST

Here is my list of three favorites -Kathleen

  1. Site A http://www.oberlin.edu/library/com
   This is the Oberlin Conservatory Music Site. Easy
    for students to find the materials, in their various formats  


  1. Site B http://www.libraries.iub.edu/index.php?pageId=90 --
    Indiana University Library-- Featuring the Cook Music Library--     Clean interface--with linking done via mouse-over hints to --     Explicitly shows the way from General to more specific 


  1. Site C http://www.lib.unc.edu/index.html
Univ. of North Carolina Library- Chapel Hill.  Lots of white

space again -- most frequently assumed info is featured first--e.g. the catalog & databases.

  1. Site D http://www.lib.umn.edu/
         Univ. of Minnesota-- Lots of white space
         again, and direct links to most used/desired/needed
         features, e.g. databases, the catalog, etc.
          This site has definitely changed since I last 
          looked.  Before I believe it had the every-space
          filled with color/design/info - more like ours still is.

Here is my list of three favorites -Gabrielle

  1. Site A
  2. Site B
  3. Site C

Meetings

  1. Friday, May 15, 2009: Met and settled process issues. Built this wiki page to begin sharing. Actions: Each person will choose and post three sites to illustrate information organization, desirable visual presentation, and ...
  2. Wednesday, May 20, 2009: Discussion of sites chosen on 5/15. Each person
    1. to describe characteristics that appeal on the site
    2. state dislikes of any site or characteristic
    3. Goal: Limit sites under consideration to 3 for the group after consideration. From Bill: I do not want to limit tomorrow; more time to digest is needed and I will not want to continue until Gabrielle's choices have been posted.
    4. Action: Come prepared at next meeting with case for one model (WLG---It may be too soon to do this. Will discuss. Choice of labels for parts of site will take 2-3 meetings, I imagine.)
Personal tools