Staffwiki talk:Building a new web

From Staffwiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 13: Line 13:
You all (including Gabrielle, who will post within a few days and sent a message explaining the delay) are giving more of your selves than I have seen many groups do at CSU.  All of us are strongly desirous of a good outcome, and keeping the voices balanced so the decisions have a little of each of us in them will be the challenge.
You all (including Gabrielle, who will post within a few days and sent a message explaining the delay) are giving more of your selves than I have seen many groups do at CSU.  All of us are strongly desirous of a good outcome, and keeping the voices balanced so the decisions have a little of each of us in them will be the challenge.
-
Thank you for the notes at the bottom.  They are substantially correct.  Our goal (and the needed action) is to settled on a set of labeled categories.
+
Thank you for the notes at the bottom.  They are substantially correct.  Our goal (and the needed action) is to settle on a set of labeled categories.
Along the way we will gather visual aspects (and widgets too, I think) that appeal (or disgust).  However, we will subjugate the visual to the classification and labeling.  Holding back strong opinions and forceful voices here is necessary, not because of rejection or lack of appreciation, but because of the experience of Graham, Goto, and Cotler and more ...  I do '''NOT''' want to choose one site as a sole model (or, at least, that would be unlikely).  Is that what you all want?
Along the way we will gather visual aspects (and widgets too, I think) that appeal (or disgust).  However, we will subjugate the visual to the classification and labeling.  Holding back strong opinions and forceful voices here is necessary, not because of rejection or lack of appreciation, but because of the experience of Graham, Goto, and Cotler and more ...  I do '''NOT''' want to choose one site as a sole model (or, at least, that would be unlikely).  Is that what you all want?

Revision as of 23:03, 19 May 2009

I also like Bev's first choice - pastel like Pullman (I want to use a green family selected set of tints from the tool at http://colorschemedesigner.com/, and well organized primary categories. While pages themselves must harmonize chromatically, parts of the site (e.g., access services, reference, gov docs, ...) can be in cooperating, but different colors.

The Vatican site is attractive, but I think people will get neck problems from tilting to read the "wheel." These non-boxy pages are actually simple to build, as are air-brushed sites. Have we found the Vatican LIBRARY page?

The site at St Xavier is simple and attractive, but I see that many of its subparts are quite distinct.

I think (and may be wrong), that Bob will like the categories and features at Pullman's eresources area (they call it "Find Journal Articles" on a prominent tab)

-Bill, 5/18


Dr. Asadi has sent assurance that pastel is preferred, together with organization from another site.

You all (including Gabrielle, who will post within a few days and sent a message explaining the delay) are giving more of your selves than I have seen many groups do at CSU. All of us are strongly desirous of a good outcome, and keeping the voices balanced so the decisions have a little of each of us in them will be the challenge.

Thank you for the notes at the bottom. They are substantially correct. Our goal (and the needed action) is to settle on a set of labeled categories.

Along the way we will gather visual aspects (and widgets too, I think) that appeal (or disgust). However, we will subjugate the visual to the classification and labeling. Holding back strong opinions and forceful voices here is necessary, not because of rejection or lack of appreciation, but because of the experience of Graham, Goto, and Cotler and more ... I do NOT want to choose one site as a sole model (or, at least, that would be unlikely). Is that what you all want?

-Bill 5/19


Personal tools